What to Do When CBP Says 1 Month but Your I-94 Shows 6 Months
What to Do When CBP Says 1 Month but Your I-94 Shows 6 Months
A traveler on a B1/B2 visa reported that the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer verbally limited the stay to one month, yet the online I-94 record shows the usual six-month admission. Which instruction controls? Under U.S. law, the I-94 governs your authorized period of stay. Nonetheless, ignoring an officer's oral warning can hurt future entries. Here is how to interpret the rules and protect yourself.
Why the I-94 Controls
- INA § 214(a)(1) authorizes DHS to establish conditions on nonimmigrant admissions.
- 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(l)(1) states that departure must occur on or before the date specified on the Form I-94.
- The I-94 is the official record of admission. CBP officers may make notes in the system, but unless they issue a corrected I-94 or a Form I-94 with a shorter date, the printed expiration date is what USCIS and the courts use to measure lawful presence.
Possible Reasons for the Warning
- Suspected immigrant intent based on travel history.
- Questionable purpose of trip (e.g., multiple lengthy stays).
- Employer misuse of visitor visas.
- System flag instructing CBP to deliver a caution but leaving the standard six-month date in place.
The officer may have intended to update the I-94 but neglected to do so, or the system defaulted to six months before the warning was delivered.
Best Practices After Admission
- Download the I-94 immediately at https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov and save a PDF copy.
- Document the officer's instructions in a travel log or email to yourself in case you are questioned on a future trip.
- Plan to depart before the shorter date whenever possible. Leaving after one month, even if six months are available, demonstrates respect for CBP’s concerns.
- Track status expiration reminders so that an unexpected short I-94 in the future does not cause an overstay.
When to Request a Correction
If the officer verbally promised six months but the I-94 shows less time, you can request a correction at a Deferred Inspection Site. Conversely, if the officer gave a shorter period verbally but the I-94 is longer, CBP generally will not shorten it after the fact. However, if your purpose of stay truly requires more than one month, consider:
- Filing Form I-539 for an extension before the I-94 expires, including proof of funds and ties abroad.
- Carrying proof of outbound travel showing that you complied with the officer’s instructions.
Consequences of Ignoring the Warning
Even if you depart by the I-94 date, CBP notes may trigger secondary inspection next time. Expect detailed questions about prior trips. Bring evidence of:
- Employment or ownership of property abroad.
- Round-trip itineraries.
- Proof that you spent most of your time outside the United States between visits.
Key Takeaways
- The I-94 controls your legal stay; keep a copy.
- Verbal instructions can influence future discretionary decisions, so comply when feasible.
- Multiple long visits on a B1/B2 visa can lead to expedited removal under INA § 235(b)(1) if CBP believes you are living in the United States without the proper status.
- If you genuinely need six months, consider departing a little early and re-entering later with stronger documentation, or apply for a more appropriate visa type.
About This Post
This analysis was inspired by a public discussion on Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/immigration/comments/1p6z0yr/b1b2_cbp_said_1_month_stay_but_i94_shows_6_months/
Immigration law is complex and constantly evolving. While this post provides general information based on current law and policy, every situation is unique.
This post provides general information and is not legal advice. Laws can change and your facts matter. To get advice for your situation, schedule a consultation with an attorney.